Many mainstream Christians consider the Religious Radical
Right to be heretical, violating the essential message of the Gospels.
The Religious
Right:
Pushing A Deadly Addiction
by
Carolyn Baker
05/16/05
"ICH"
- - In recent article, I promised readers that
I would address the mindset of the religious right as an addiction. In order
to do so with accuracy and clarity, it is first necessary to define addiction and clarify the terms, Christian fundamentalism and Dominionism.
According
to www.dictionary.com, an addiction is "being
abnormally tolerant to and dependent on something that is psychologically or
physically habit-forming (especially alcohol or narcotic drugs) [syn: dependence, dependency, habituation] 2: an abnormally strong craving 3: (Roman law) under Roman law addiction was the
justification for slavery"
For over
seventy years, Twelve-Step programs have addressed issues of addiction not
only to substances such as alcohol, drugs, and food, but to behaviors such
as compulsive gambling, shopping, and even working. After a number of
responses to my last article from former fundamentalist Christians, I began
investigating Twelve-Step groups which address issues of religious
compulsion and spiritual abuse. One group I discovered was Fundamentalists
Anonymous (F.A.) and its Twelve Steps. (http://www.geocities.com/church_of_hank/fundamentalists_anonymous.html)
However,
before I examine those steps, I would like to further define the terrorist
and tyrannical aspects of Christian fundamentalism.
As many
readers drew to my attention in response to my last article, Christian
fundamentalism and Dominionism are not necessarily synonymous. According to
Merriam-Webster, Christian fundamentalism is: "a movement in 20th century
Protestantism emphasizing the literally interpreted Bible as fundamental to
Christian life and teaching b : the beliefs of this movement c : adherence
to such beliefs. 2 : a movement or attitude stressing strict and literal
adherence to a set of basic principles."
Katherine
Yurica (www.yuricareport.com)
defines Dominionism as "the conversion of America to a theocracy by taking
over the American Judiciary." I would add that the conquest might begin with
the judiciary, but the Dominionist agenda has targeted all aspects of
government and society for the establishment of a theocracy.
For my
purposes, the distinction between fundamentalist Christianity and
Dominionism is incidental because what is most important to understand is
that any religion, philosophy, or belief system can be addictive,
fear-based, and terrorizing, and if it is used to justify changing the
Constitution of the United States and creating a society in which the laws
of that system are also fear-based and terrorizing, then regardless of the
label, fundamentalist or Dominionist, that system is both terrorist and
tyrannical. Whether one wishes to debate the differences between
fundamentalist Christianity and Dominionism or not, both systems are
about domination, power, control, right/wrong; win/lose. Moreover, as in my
last article, I am reiterating that terrorism and tyranny,
like the word addiction, have much broader definitions than crashing
planes into buildings, establishing a superior race, or forcing women to
cover their faces.
My focus
here is on fundamentalist Christianity and Dominionism as religious systems
which complement and support tyrannical political systems, specifically,
fascism. I am well aware that not all fundamentalist Christians, and
certainly not all folks who call themselves evangelicals, are of the
Dominionist variety. Many are hard-working individuals who pay their bills
and follow the rules and attempt to live the teachings of Jesus. I respect
those individuals and consider them a mitigating force amid the onslaughts
of the religious right.
For an in-depth analysis of religious right corruption
and tyranny, I highly recommend the recent article "The Christian Mafia" (http://www.insider-magazine.com/ChristianMafia.htm) by investigative journalist, Wayne Madsen.
Additionally, my intention in this article is to explore the addictive
features of these systems which ultimately result not in spiritual well
being but spiritual abuse.
Spiritual
abuse is the manipulation, exploitation, and mistreatment-- mentally,
emotionally, or physically of another individual or masses of individuals,
in the name of promoting spiritual principles or values. As we have seen
from the rampant sexual abuse of children in the Roman Catholic Church,
spiritual abuse can open the door to every other kind of abuse. And just as
a plethora of Catholic priests for two thousand years have used their
position of authority and piety to abuse children, countless children in
fundamentalist Christian homes have been beaten, raped, molested, shamed,
and emotionally devastated in the name of "children obey your parents in the
Lord for this is right." I suspect that in the not-too-distant future, we
may see revelations of child abuse in fundamentalist Christian homes and
churches break into the light of day that could pale by comparison the abuse
scandal of the Roman Catholic Church. For the fundamentalist Christian,
children too, born into "original sin", are to be dominated and made into
subservient born-again believers as soon as possible.
Also,
before turning to the Twelve Steps of Fundamentalists Anonymous., I want to
emphasize that religious intoxication is an ancient theme in human history.
In fact, Carl Jung would have called it an archetype-a universal theme
imbedded in the human psyche that is found in all eras and cultures.
According to Jung, such an archetype is not necessarily toxic or
pathological but points to an inherent human craving for meaningful
spiritual experiences. Whether found in the spell for the revival of Osiris,
the orgiastic rites of the cult of Dionysius in Ancient Greece, or the
Native American sun dance, the need for sacred ritual and celebration of the
divine is as old as human history. However, need and desire are not the same
as physical, emotional, or mental dependence.
What
makes a belief system, a ritual, or one's relationship with other adherents
addictive is the dependence one has on them. Is one able to think for
oneself? Is one able to function without incessant participation in the
rituals, and without obsessive contact with and validation from fellow
devotees? Is one able to trust one's intellect and emotions and not
subordinate them to those who claim to have more spiritual authority, deeper
spiritual understanding, or more extensive training in interpreting the
Bible or other sacred writings?
In
exploring this topic, a caveat is in order for all who are atheist,
agnostic, or offended by the mention of "God" in the Twelve Steps. After
many years of working with the Steps and atheists and agnostics who utilize
them, I have discovered that there are many ways to interpret and apply the
concept of a Higher Power, so I would ask the atheist or agnostic reader to
consider this and continue reading.
Why do I
think that Christian fundamentalism and/or Domininonism is an addiction? My
answer to that question comes first of all from my own experience, as well
as my observation of these individuals over the years. I recall my own
dependency on what "the Bible says"-my own inability to trust my thoughts
and feelings. I remember the need for the "fix" of the church service, the
revival meeting, the prayer meeting, the Bible study, or listening to a
fiery sermon on tape. I knew how to think on my own, but I was afraid to do
so. Who knew what I might discover? But no "fix" was more deliciously
validating than "winning souls for Christ"-that dramatic moment when I had
manipulated someone else into a born-again experience. For this, the
fundamentalist Christian addict lives and breathes. And this is precisely
why the religious right is intractably hell-bent on converting the entire
society and system of government in America to its fundamentalist theocracy.
What could produce a greater "high"? And if this project should get
interrupted by the Rapture, the resulting euphoria would be so
well-earned-doing God's work and getting the planet ready for Jesus' return.
The adrenaline-drenched grandiosity in such a scenario is palpably
tantalizing. More addictive than heroin perhaps?
It is
axiomatic in Christian fundamentalism that without the born-again
experience, one cannot think clearly. Being born into the human condition,
and therefore, being inherently sinful, one's mind is deluded, clouded, and
always potential putty in the hands of Satan. Once one has been born again,
the mind is magically transformed, and one is now guided by the Holy Spirit
who Jesus said would lead his followers into all truth. The more the
born-again believer reads and studies the Bible, the more clearly and
correctly he/she thinks. Therefore, the new convert to fundamentalist
Christianity must depend on his/her minister, Bible teacher,
evangelist, or other spiritual leader to interpret the Bible and guide
him/her in living the Christian life. Eventually, with years of seasoning in
the faith, one needs less guidance, but one always requires regular contact
with the church, prayer group, or Bible study circle because even after
decades of devotion, there is always the possibility that one could be
deceived by the devil. Therefore, thinking for oneself is out of the
question, and as a result, profound dependence on others is created for
producing the "answers" one cannot discern by thinking for oneself.
In one of
the responses to my last article, one actively fundamentalist reader, whom I
am paraphrasing, stated that he does look to the Bible for answers and asked
to whom or what else he should look-Darwin, Camus, or other great minds? I
found the question itself very telling because inherent in it is the
assumption that one cannot or should not trust oneself. This assumption
constitutes the major underpinning of the addiction to Christian
fundamentalism, hence Step One of Fundamentalists Anonymous:
1.
I realize that I had turned control of my mind over to another person or
group, who had assumed power over my thinking.
The convert to
fundamentalist Christianity must be convinced that his/her thinking is
irreparably in error. The underlying message is: "You don't believe the
Bible is the inerrant Word of God because your mind has been occupied by
Satan. This has happened principally because you are a human being, but also
because you have made the enormous mistake of trying to think for yourself.
Of course you think there are contradictions in the Bible because Satan
controls your mind. If you surrender your mind to Jesus (actually to
me/us/the enlightened flock of believers), you will understand that there
are no contradictions in the Bible and that your life should be guided only
by the Bible and nothing else. What you cannot now understand, you must take
on faith, and more will be revealed to you later. It may not be revealed on
this earth, but by accepting Christ as your personal savior and having
faith, you will be guaranteed eternity in heaven where everything you never
understood will be completely revealed to you."
Curiously, as
stated in the definition of addiction above, under ancient Roman law,
addiction was grounds for slavery. I found this detail particularly
significant because obviously, addicted people are "enslaved" people
Any thinking
person reading the Bible will discover dozens, if not hundreds, of
contradictions. Moreover, any Bible student who also studies history will
discover massive discrepancies regarding which books were chosen to be in
the Bible and why. Studying that history reveals that the decision to
incorporate certain books and exclude others was primarily a fourth-century
political decision intended to strengthen the appeal of Christianity and
prevent its demise in the face of Rome's attempts to extinguish the
religion.
An excellent
analysis of this controversy has been done by religious historian, Elaine
Pagels in her book Beyond Belief. She explores the discoveries of the
Nag Hammadi Library in Upper Egypt in 1945, which unearthed the existence of
numerous gospels eliminated from the final canon of the New Testament. Both
Pagels and another Biblical scholar, Marvin Meyer, have analyzed the Nag
Hammadi writings and hypothesized the reasons for their exclusion. I
particularly enjoyed reading Pagels' Beyond Belief, because not only
does she analyze the controversy surrounding the exclusion of these Gnostic
Gospels, but she openly shares her own intellectual process of discovering
the significance of their exclusion and its impact on her own spirituality.
Very UN-fundamentalist indeed.
Reading the
research of Pagels and others makes clear the reality that the Bible is not
and cannot be the inerrant, impeccably-written, divinely dictated Word of
God that fundamentalist Christians claim it to be. Thus Step Two of
Fundamentalists Anonymous states:
2. That person or group persuaded me of
the inerrancy of the Bible, in spite of its many internal contradictions.
One of the most
significant aspects of my abandonment of Christian fundamentalism was the
awareness that born-again Christians worship the Bible and not God. They
argue that the only way to know God is through the Bible. They are forced to
believe this because if they concede that God might speak through an inner
voice, through a tree, or through a particular life experience, their entire
belief system is toast. When I realized that contrary to their much-touted
Ten Commandments, Bible worship is nothing less than "having other gods
before me", I finally realized the depth of the hypocrisy of their system.
Part of my, and anyone's recovery from fundamentalism is a commitment to
develop a relationship with a Higher Power-whatever that may be-and not with
a book. Step Three therefore states:
3. I became addicted to the Bible as the
supreme focus of my faith, in spite of the commandment that God should come
first.
Like the
spiritual inventory of Alcoholics Anonymous and other Twelve-Step programs,
Step Four asks the recovering fundamentalist to look at the damage one has
done to oneself as a result of turning control of one's mind over to another
person or group. Not a pretty picture in most cases, but certainly a huge
relief when the whole truth is finally faced and spoken.
4. I admit to God, to myself and to
another person the shortcomings of my belief in the unbelievable.
Fundamentalist
Christianity is filled with false claims about the Bible. It has to be in
order to keep its system intact and use the Bible to manipulate, control,
and above all, gain converts. So as part of recovering from addiction to
fundamentalism, one must examine the various false claims one has made about
the Bible. Step Five states:
5. I have made an inventory of my false
claims about
the Bible.
Ouch! This could
be very painful-and it could go on for years as one recalls all the times
one may have used "the Bible says" to beat up oneself or someone else. But
again, there can be profound liberation with truth-telling.
Could it get
more painful than Steps Four and Five? Yes. How many minds have I whacked
beside my own? Who have I manipulated, controlled, cajoled, or conned by
using false claims-things I could never absolutely know or prove about the
Bible?
6. I have made a list of those whom I led
into confusion about the Bible.
All Twelve Step
programs require "searching and fearless" inventories of oneself and one's
actions while practicing one's addiction. Moreover, they demand
accountability to one's Higher Power, oneself, and the persons harmed.
This could be
excruciating! Admitting to someone that I may have led them astray with the
Bible? As experienced Twelve-Steppers know, it may not be possible to make
the amends in person or even by letter. Someone may be so hurt, so angry, so
alienated that making contact with him/her is not feasible. Most important,
however, is the admission to oneself. Hence Step Seven:
7. I am willing to make amends to all those
whom I may have led astray.
And now comes
the payoff: sanity. Sanity is not a mental health term but rather a state of
acceptance and release often attended by a sense of relief. After one has
admitted turning one's mind over to another person or group and has faced
the devastation the addiction has caused, and if possible, made amends to
those harmed, it becomes possible to experience sanity.
>
Step Eight, in
offering the hope of sanity refers to searching Scripture for the truth.
Notice the Step says "search Scripture." It doesn't say, "search the Scripture." One now has the freedom to search for one's own truth-wherever,
whenever, however. Step Eight:
8. I realize that I have the inner power to restore
sanity to my life and to search Scripture for the truth.
Having completed
the first eight Steps, the recovering fundamentalist can begin authentic
relationships with others regarding spirituality. No longer does one need to
"be right", convert, admonish, exhort, or teach. The first eight Steps make
it possible to share on a truly level playing field without right/wrong,
either/or dichotomies. Step Nine:
9. I will reach out to friends who can
help me clarify my thinking about the Bible, God and Jesus.
Reaching out to
friends is not the same as dependence. It means information-gathering,
exploring, dialoging, but most importantly, thinking for oneself.
Then
brilliantly, Step Ten hastens to add that I do not need to figure it out all
on my own; I can ask for help from a Higher Power. It humbly implies that I
don't have all the answers. I have help, but it is with my own mind that I
grasp the truth, not with someone else's.
10. I confess that only with God's help
can my mind
grasp the truth.
How do I get
help from a Higher Power? I practice Step Eleven which deals with conscious
contact with that power. This may have nothing to do with reading the Bible
or going to church. It may have nothing to do with meditating in a lotus
posture or praying in the traditional sense. It may mean journaling,
spending time in nature, painting, composing music or poetry.
11. I will seek through prayer and
meditation to improve my conscious contact with God, praying for knowledge
of God's will for me and the power to carry that out.
One of the most
profound aspects of recovering from any addiction is the compassion one
experiences for others who are still ensnared in the addiction. One
naturally wants to share the liberation, peace, and sense of well being that
one has found with others who are suffering. What might be particularly
challenging for the recovering fundamentalist, however, is to share the
Twelve Steps of Fundamentalists Anonymous without falling back into one's
addiction to proselytize and "being right." So Step Twelve must be practiced
sensitively and compassionately.
12. Having had a spiritual awakening as
the result of these twelve steps, I will offer these steps to other former
biblical fundamentalists.
Some may argue
that I am being judgmental and lacking compassion in this article and my
former article on Christian fundamentalism. However, I do not apologize for
being uncompromising in my analysis. As with all addictions, compassion for
the addict does not mean condoning addictive behavior. It means speaking the
truth about the addiction to the addict him/herself, to the family and loved
ones involved with the addict, or anyone else affected by his/her behavior.
This is referred to in recovery circles as an intervention. Is it not
appropriate for critically thinking individuals who desire to live in a
diverse and open society to conduct "interventions" when those drunk on
Dominionism and fundamentalist Christianity flagrantly attempt to construct
a theocracy which requires everyone to be a born-again Christian in order to
thrive in that society? Do we not have a moral obligation to confront
destructive religious intoxication that tears apart families, communities,
and nations? Hopefully, this article is an example of such an intervention.
The mainstream
media does not seem to comprehend the inherent danger of the religious right
let alone report it accurately. All of us need to challenge the addictive
tyranny of Christian fundamentalism at every turn-for the sake of our sanity
and for the sake of our civil liberties. We don't allow street junkies into
the halls of Congress, the Supreme Court, or the pulpits of America to
admonish us how we should live and why we should demolish our Constitution.
In fact, we confront the insanity and criminality of such individuals.
Similarly, it's time to confront the domination drug for what it is-a grave
and perverse spiritual and moral illness.
Carolyn Baker
is recovering fundamentalist Christian and an adjunct professor of history
and lives in Southern New Mexico. She can be contacted at: cbaker@nmsu.edu
Copyright © Carolyn Baker. All rights reserved. You may republish under the following conditions: An
active link to the original publication must be provided. http://liberty.hypermart.net/voices/2005/print/The_Religious_Right_Pushing_A_Deadly_Addiction.htm You must not alter, edit or remove any text within the article,
including this copyright notice. |
